1H 2026 Half-Year Results Presentation

Welcome to the Jardine-Methasen half-year results presentation. I am Suzanne Chuk, head of Treasury and investor relations. Joining us today are our CEO, Lincoln Pan, and CFO, Graham Baker, who will give an update of our strategic progress and financial performance in the first half of 2026. The presentation deck is now available on the Jardin corporate website. Just a reminder, all numbers are in US dollars unless otherwise stated. We will address questions at the end of the presentation. You may start inputting your questions by scanning the QR code at the bottom of the screen. Thank you. I'll now pass the time to Lincoln. Thank you, Suzanne. And a good morning to everyone from here in Singapore. We've had an exciting first half of 2026, highlighted by our first ever Investor Day, our acquisition of IMED, continued efforts on portfolio simplification, all in the efforts to drive total shareholder returns. At our Investor Day in June, we provided clarity on our strategic and financial objectives

and we set a clear mission, that Jardines will be an outstanding investor and owner, dedicated to building diverse, high-quality scaled businesses in Asia Pacific, offering stable and sustainable top quartile shareholder returns. This has been developed in full partnership with our principal shareholders, the Kestex, and our board of directors. To remind our shareholders in June, we made a number of commitments which we targeted to deliver by 2030. First, delivering at least 9% per annum, 5-year total shareholder return. Second, growing the Jardine-Matheson dividend by at least 5% annually, which were well placed to do at least in 2026, recycling at least $4 billion of capital from the portfolio, excluding additional capital recycling commitments made by Hong Kong Land and Astra, and importantly, building at least $200 million of earnings from new high-quality growth pillars through acquisitions such as IMED. In addition to these commitments, we also announced a new follow-on $500 million share buyback program for Jardini Matheson Holdings.

Now, we are ready delivering against these objectives. Corporate simplification remains a priority. In January, we completed the privatization of Mandarin Oriental, and Jardine Cycle and Carriage has announced simplification actions, specifically the distribution and specie of shares in Toyota Mortal Corporation, together with a special cash dividend for proceeds from our sale of TMC shares. The distribution and specie would enable JCNC to further simplify its portfolio, allowing it to focus on stewardship of Astra and our Vietnam assets. We are focused to further simplify the JCNC portfolio going forward. In the first half, Jardine Matheson and its portfolio companies recycled 1.5 billion in capital and reinvested her May commitments to invest 3.2 billion of capital. Excluding Astra and Hong Kong Land, we recycled just under 500 million in the first half of 2026, representing 12% of our 2030 target of $4 billion. We'll remain active in the

second half to push toward realizing at least 20% of this target in 2026 and are planning ahead for more realizations in 2027. We've made further progress exiting non-control holdings. We've divested the majority of our holdings in vinamilk and reduced our holdings in Toyota and Dongshang. Investors should expect us to continue to divest and and recycle positions in line with our strategic direction, while we will continue to invest via buybacks, bolt-on acquisitions, and new pillars of long-term growth. In May, we announced the acquisition of iMed, and at Investor Day in June, we detailed Jardine Engineering and Infrastructure's ambitious growth agenda. And we have made substantial progress restructuring Jardine Matheson as a lean and focused investment company. Jardine Headcount has been reduced by around 47% since 2024 while building a high-caliber investment and portfolio support team with Irene Liu and Chris Gannis joining the team in the last several months.

Additional senior hires will be announced in the four-year end. On IMED, the 2.4 billion acquisition of IMED represents a significant step for Jardine in its strategic evolution as a control owner of high-quality businesses in the APAC region. With a long history of high-quality earnings growth, IMED will provide an additional source of positive momentum and diversification into the Jardine's portfolio. IMED's performance with a fiscal year ending June 2026 is in line with our expectations and our transaction underwriting. We are working at this time to put in place an independent board of directors and to upgrade the CEO position. With the Jardine-Matheson balance sheet in a strong position, we continue to look for other new control investment opportunities and strengthening our existing platforms via bolt-on acquisitions, namely through IMED, Jardine Engineering and Infrastructure, and Mandarin Oriental. Where we see value in our existing portfolio, we have and will continue to support

share buybacks and share purchases at the Jardine Matheson and the portfolio company levels. There have been substantial over the last five years with JMH investing $8.5 billion. In the first half of 2026, Jardine Matheson completed the $250 million US share buyback program announced in November, which we immediately followed with a new $500 million share buyback program we announced at our investor day in June. At the half year, we also have open buyback programs across Hong Kong land, Astra, and United Tractors. And just as a reminder, looking forward to 2030, you should expect our dividend to grow at least 5% per annum, which we will deliver in 2026, buybacks that continue where and when we see value, and investments approximately the same amount as dividends and buybacks combined and a small number of scaled, controlled investments and high quality businesses to drive earnings growth by and well beyond 2030. Sustainability remains an important enabler of long-term value across Jardines and our

portfolio. Our ESG ratings have continued improvement. For one rate of heat rating, we've moved from CCC to BB over the last five years. In particular, on decarbonization, we want to approach decarbonization commitments in the same way we manage our financial budgets, meaning commitments to improve year-on-year performance. I will now hand over to Graham, who will take us through the first half financial performance. Thanks, Lincoln. Jadine Matheson's portfolio delivered a positive performance in the first half of 2026. Parent cash flows grew robustly and adjusted underlying net profit was up 9% to $735 million. This figure adjusts for prior year disposals and the impact of the change in Zhongsheng accounting. The proposed interim dividend is 8% higher at 65 cents per share. I'd note here that while we've upgraded our full year dividend guidance to at least $2.47 per share, consistent with our guidance given at the investor day for dividend growth of

at least 5% per annum until 2030. However, you should assume that 8% growth in the interim dividend is also a rebalancing to increase the interim as a share of the full year payout. We'll look now more closely at underlying earnings. As mentioned, first half underlying net profit adjusted for disposals and the Jangshung reclassification increased by 9% to $735 million. The key components of this, as shown on the slide, were higher shareholdings in JCNC, MO and Hong Kong land, which drove 2% growth, 10% organic growth at constant FX across the portfolio. Within that, 4% reflected one-off lease re-measurement gains in Jardine Pacific's motor business, and a larger than normal FX headwind of 3%, principally from depreciation of the Indonesian

repair. Overall, 5% underlying growth, excluding the effect of disposals, reclassifications and a non-recurring lease gain, is an encouraging performance amid ongoing economic challenges in our largest market. Looking in more detail at underlying net profit by business, Astra remained our largest contributor despite the challenges, which were primarily felt as a slowdown in the mining solutions segment. Astra's automotive, consumer finance businesses in Indonesia remained resilient, growing in the first half. Hong Kong land, Jardine Pacific and DFI also grew strongly, once again demonstrating the value of our diversified portfolio. Corporate costs were lower as net financing costs in the prior year reversed to net financing income as proceeds from capital recycling moved the parent balance sheet to a net cash

position at the beginning of the year. I'll cover the core portfolio companies in more detail in a moment. Outside underlying earnings, the group recorded a net non-trading loss of $196 million, 17% than the loss recorded in the prior year. Following the change of accounting for Jung Shung, the investment is now marked to market and Jung Shung's share price weakness was the largest contributor to the fair value loss recorded on other investments. Our interest in Jung Shung dropped from 21% to 14% in the first half. Following Hong Kong land we also recorded our share of the profits from build to sell through non-trading as they steadily wind down the business over a number of years. As usual, Hong Kong land also drove the largest part of the fair value adjustment on investment properties.

We recorded an increase in the first half of 2026 as the central market in Hong Kong continued its recovery, bringing higher open market rents for office and marginally lower cap rates in the retail portfolio as the tomorrow's central renovations progressed and luxury retail demand grew. On the group's balance sheet, net borrowings, excluding Astra's financial services companies, increased by $906 million, although gearing remained very modest at 7%. The increase was principally driven by payment of Mandarin Orientals special dividend following the completion of the sale of One Causeway Bay and at Astra, which completed acquisition of the ASA Goldmine and progressed buyback programs at parent level and United tractors. JCNC reduced its net debt using proceeds from the sale of shares in VinaMilk and half of its position in Toyota Motor Corp. And JMParent further built its net cash position despite

completing the privatisation of Mandarin Oriental in the first half. Group cash flows from operating activities for the period were down $600 million, primarily due to more challenging conditions in Astra's mining solutions business. Cash flows from investing activities recorded a net outflow of $392 million, compared to an inflow of $416 million in the prior year. This principally reflected higher outflows for other capital expenditure, which rose to $1.7 billion, as in addition to ongoing organic capex, Hong Kong Land completed its investment in Sun-Tech REIT and Astra its goldmine investment. The sale of associates and JVs mainly comprised the transfer of MBFC and One Raffles Key to Hong Kong Land's private REIT in Singapore. The sale of investment properties included the handover of four floors of one exchange

square to the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, and other disposals mainly reflected JCNC's sales of shares in VINNAMILC and TMC and our own sale of shares in Zhongshan. Cash outflows from financing activities were broadly in line with the prior year. The group has $12.7 billion in liquidity headroom to finance future growth. Overall, the group's portfolio companies continue to be highly cash generative, supported by strong balance sheets and access to considerable liquidity. Now turning to Jardine Mathison's corporate balance sheet and cash flows at the parent company level, parent free cash flow rose strongly by 21% to $709 million in the first half primarily reflecting strong performance by the portfolio companies in 2025 and newly enhanced recurring payout policies from some of them. Cash cover for the

Jardine Mathison dividend remained very comfortable at 1.9 times. The parent company's net cash position of $379 million at period end comprised 10 and 15-year bonds, totalling $1.2 billion, issued in 2021 at an effective interest rate of 2.6%, and $1.6 billion of corporate cash held at leading high-quality regional and global banks. We have, of course, committed to the acquisition of IMED, which we expect to complete in the second half, and are progressing our new follow-on $500 million buyback programme. However, with further capital recycling ongoing, including JM's share of the special dividend announced yesterday by JCNC, we expect the corporate balance sheet to remain in a strong position at year-end. And with further, substantial committed facilities, the group has ample flexibility for new capital

deployments should they arise. I'll now go through the performance of our core portfolio companies for details, do refer directly to our company's respective results briefings. Looking first at Astra, unless otherwise stated, the numbers on this slide are shown in local currency and like all the other portfolio company slides are on a 100% basis. Net profit in local currency was 14.9 trillion rupee a 7% decline compared to the first half of 2025. This was primarily driven by a lower contribution from the mining solutions segment as some customers' coal quotas were restricted and the Matabe gold mine was out of production. Importantly, though, and evidence of the resilience of the Indonesian economy, earnings were up in the automotive, financial services and other segments. Astra's contribution to Jardin's underlying net profit, excluding

non-trading items fell by 8%, the effects of the weak rupiah were partly offset by an increase in Jardine's effective shareholding. Astra's five-year TSR was at 6.6% per annum despite challenging macroeconomic and investor sentiment. As Lincoln mentioned, Astra and United Tractors both have active share buyback programmes aligned to their new shareholder-led, shareholder-return-led strategy. The operating environment in Indonesia may remain uncertain in the short term, although we are encouraged that the Martaabe gold miners return to operation. However, we remain confident in Indonesia and Astra as long-term fundamentals and are committed to both. Hong Kong Land continues to see strong five-year TSR as it makes meaningful progress against its Vision 2035 strategy. Capital recycled by Hong Kong Land rose a further $100 million

3.7 billion, 93% of their announced target for delivery by 2027. Net debt has fallen a further 5% to $3.4 billion, providing capacity to fund future investment and growth. Underlying net profit was 11% higher at $259 million, benefiting from lower net financing costs. earnings per share rose 14% as their buybacks progressed. The interim dividend which Jardines will receive increased by 33% to $94 million, reflecting a rebalancing of Hong Kong land's annual dividend payout towards the interim as well as upgraded earnings guidance for the year. Total equity increased by 2% to $31.4 billion, reflecting progress at West Bund and the upward valuation adjustments already mentioned in central. DFI's contribution to Jardine's underlying net profit in the first half increased by 49%

to $90 million, excluding the impact of disposals. Execution of its customer-first strategy saw positive sales and profit momentum across all banners in its key markets, which together with lower financing costs drove continued strong growth. DFI have also revised their full year earnings guidance upwards to between $285 million and $305 million. 2025's strong growth, as well as an increased dividend payout ratio saw Jardine's share of the interim dividend increased by 77% to $65 million. DFI finished the half year with minimal net debt providing capacity to fund strategic priorities ahead. Mandarin Oriental reported lower underlying net profit due to a lower contribution from owned hotels with disposals in Miami and Munich impacting as well as closure of the Hong

Kong property for renovation. The management business remains stable despite the impact of conflict in the Middle East. the management business of course remains the focus for future growth and another five new management contracts were announced in the first half of 2026. As noted earlier, Mandarin paid a special dividend of $668 million to Jardines in January following the disposal of the top floors of One Causeway Bay. Part of this was used to fund the privatisation. Jardine Pacific reported higher underlying net profit of $102 million, up $35 million or 51%. Of that, $24 million was attributable to lease re-measurement gains reported as part of others, which will not recur in the second half. The remainder came from recovery in the consumer businesses.

Jardine Engineering and Infrastructure was marginally down in the first half of the year but is trading in line with expectations and typically sees the larger part of annual profits delivered in the second half of the year. As shared at the investor day in June, GEI has a target to double earnings by 2030. JCNC's contribution to underlying net profit, that is excluding the impact of the VINNER milk disposal, remained flat at $45 million. Improved contributions came from the Vietnam businesses and lower financing costs. Foreign exchange gains recognised in the prior year did not recur as the underlying loans were either repaid or re-denominated in Singapore dollars. JCNC made further progress on portfolio action initiatives, specifically the sale of shares in their listed investments in VinaMilk and half their holding in Toyota.

Following the TMC divestment, JCNC has proposed a special dividend of approximately $0.73 per share comprising a cash distribution funded from the proceeds of the part sale and a distribution in specie of the remaining TMC shares. distribution in specie enables shareholders to choose between holding Toyota shares directly or realising the value in cash. Overall corporate costs at Jardine's parent more than halved in the first half of 2026 due to net financing income generated following the significant recent capital recycling activity. While within this overall reduction, net overheads grew. This was predominantly as a result of lower management fees charged to the portfolio companies. As the benefits of head office restructuring come through in the second half, we expect to see significant cost reductions net of building our new investment team and therefore

expect overheads for the full year to be broadly in line with 2025. Finally, looking ahead to the full year, our guidance given in March recognised that Jardine's 2026 underlying earnings will exclude a number of items that contributed meaningfully in 2025. Specifically, businesses disposed by DFI, primarily Singapore Food and Robinson's Retail, VINNER milk shares disposed by JCNC, and finally the equity share of earnings from Zhongshun, which with our reclassification of Zhongshun to be an investment rather than associate, are no longer reported. After adjusting for these changes, our pro-former 2025 underlying EPS base for 2026 estimates was $5.33. We've seen encouraging first half results, even putting aside the non-recurring lease gain in Jardin Pacific.

These have led to guidance upgrades at DFI and Hong Kong Land. However, uncertainty remains over the short-term trajectory for earnings in Indonesia, our largest contributor. Accordingly, we believe it's prudent for now to hold our earnings guidance unchanged for 2026 underlying earnings to be broadly in line with 2025 adjusted for business disposals. We will of course provide a further update once we've seen results in the third quarter with the IMS release in November. As outlined at the investor day, though, we can say already that Jardine's fully a dividend will rise at least 5% to $2.47 per share. With that, I'll hand back to Lincoln. Thank you, Graham. To conclude, Jardine's is already delivering against the strategic goals we set out at our investor day. Underlying earnings and parent-free cash flow remain robust, and our strong execution of recycling initiatives across the portfolio positions Jardine's well for further investment activity

in the next 18 months. Our 4-year underlying net profit outlook remains unchanged at $5.33 despite turbulent conditions in our largest market. We'll continue assessing the outlook over the course of Q3. The resilient returns and cash generating capacity of our portfolio, as well as the comfortable cash cover give us confidence to declare an interim Jardimathesen dividend of $0.65 per share, up 8%, and a full year dividend of at least $2.47, up 5%. Our focus as we enter the second half is to continue driving total shareholder returns, improving cash flow across our portfolio, portfolio simplification, improving astroperformance, and importantly, integrating IMED into our portfolio. I'm pleased with the progress we have made in the first half of 2026. There remains much to do. Jardines must continue to evolve, build investment capability, upgrade talent, actively improve our portfolio, and manage risk and return on our portfolio.

We will now take questions and over to you, Suzanne. Thank you, Lincoln. As a reminder, if you wish to ask a question, please scan the QR code at the at the bottom of the screen and do not use the Q&A function in the Zoom. The first question came from Jaden Venterikas of Macquarie. He has two questions. The first is, the cash build up was positive in the first half of 26 and factoring in the IMAT purchase during the second half, does management have a view on where net cash or net debt would end up by the end of the year? The second question, on Mandarin Oriental, following the privatization, the profit contribution declined. Is it purely a timing issue due to renovations, or were there other underlying trends to call out? Yeah, sure, I'll take the first one. So look, Jaden, obviously we're in pretty good position for funding IMED.

That's very clear. But beyond that, obviously the net cash position depends on, as I mentioned, ongoing activities in terms of recycling, as well as the fact that we have an ongoing net surplus from income in over the dividends that we pay out in cash. So there's still a reasonably wide range of outcomes for the balance sheet position at the parent by the end of the year. At the top end of that, we could be pretty much neutral. At the lower end, we could be a few hundred million dollars in net debt. We'll obviously see how those discussions progress. They have to deliver value, and they have to make sense. But something in that ballpark is probably the right range

to think about. And then your question, Amandran, I think there are two primary factors to the lower performance in terms of profit. First is the renovation of our property in Hong Kong, which is a quite significant portion of underlying earnings. The second is not unexpectedly some slowdown in our properties in the Middle East due to the conflict in the region. Next question came from John Lam of EBS. There are two questions. How is the search of the IMAT new CEO? One question, you mentioned significant progress of capital recycling in a second half of 26, 20% of the 4 billion commitment. How should we look at that? Okay. So in terms of the IMS CEO, I think we have developed a very strong network of partners and relationships in the healthcare sector in Australia. And I think what we want to do is do a systematic search and look at a wide range of potential

options for the business. We've appointed a consultant to help us with this. We're in the process of interviewing and discussing with the senior doctors within IMED, management with IMED, on what the shape of a new CEO of the business will look like. And I do think by the end of the year, we'll be ready and in a position to announce a new CEO. In terms of capital recycling, we have a number of initiatives going on across the portfolio. I think there's some low yielding, non-core real estate assets, both commercial and residential, we continue to work on. There's a number of other businesses which we don't think will fit our long-term portfolio, which we're in the process of trying to explore exits on. And ultimately, we're also looking to further divest some of our public market positions. Ultimately, 2026 is a time period and we'll deliver everything we can. But ultimately, our goal is to deliver this $4 billion of recycling across the non-Hong Kong land and non-ASTRO portfolio as quickly as possible. The next question came from Car Chan of JP Morgan.

Cara has three questions. The first one on earnings guidance. The first half 26 earnings were up 9% but four year earnings guidance is still just flat. Is this a conservative guidance? Second question on Indonesia. At the investor day, we said that we aim to diversify exposure. So, however, JAM has been increasing stake in JCNC. How should they interpret this? And with the recent geopolitical outlook, there could be more challenges in the Indonesian economy. Does JM has a plan B? The third question on macro. Some other Hong Kong-based conglomerates takes a very cautious stance towards the global economy, and thus their priority is to recruit as much cash as possible. What's JM's view on the global macro? Can I take? All right, Scott. Sure, I'll take that one. Look, guidance is guidance. We don't say whether it's conservative whether it's reckless, we give you the guidance that we think is appropriate at this point

in time. Clearly, it does reflect a degree of caution that would be reflected in a slowdown, but obviously one of the reasons for pulling out the impact of the non-recurring gain, which accounts for 4% of the 9% growth, is to understand that things can pop up positively or negatively. As we said, we'll give further guidance when we get through the third quarter. OK. In terms of, first off, the question around Indonesia, we have several things happening in the Indonesian market. First off, there's a shock in the capital markets due to MSCI reviews and broader overall concerns about the macro economy. If you go back to the fundamentals around Astra, Astra's automotive business, Astra's financing business, had an outstanding first half of the year. So as we step back as a long-term investor, we are focused on driving cash-on-cash return out of our Astra portfolio.

And we continue to see value in that portfolio. We continue to do a lot of value creation work together with the Astra management, with active buybacks going on within Astra United tractors. So despite macro global concerns around the Indonesian capital markets, the fundamentals of the Astra business continue to be ones that we're excited about. You should look at our occasional efforts to buy JCNC shares is it is TSR driven, it is return driven, and when it hits a certain level, we may continue to build our stake in JCNC. Ultimately, as we see value as a way to drive earnings and a way to drive returns in our portfolio. In terms of broader macro, I think as we've talked about many times in prior sessions in our strategy day, we like Indonesia, it is a very significant part of our portfolio, Diversification is a good way, and I think the right way, to balance off risk in a somewhat volatile global macro conditions, and we will continue to do that. Part of our capital recycling efforts here

reflect the desire to build a cash war chest and a decreased risk in our portfolio and the strength in our balance sheet. It doesn't mean, as we do capital recycling initiatives, that capital is gonna go out the door right away. I continue to look at the next 12 to 24 months as a period where jardines needs to be careful and opportunistic and how it deploys capital. We're not going to deploy capital for diversification's sake. We're only going to put capital to work. If we believe in a long-term growth of the sector, there's good quality return on capital for us, and it meets our TSR objectives. The next questions came from Kyle Choi of Bank of America. His question was also on earnings guidance, which we covered. Second question, why do a distribution of Toyota shares instead of outright sale of the shares? Second question, can you share more color on the qualities you were seeking for the new CEO of IMAT? What's the departure of the former CEO planned? Okay, in terms of the distribution and shares of Toyota,

first off, Toyota is an extremely important long-term partner of Astra and Jardine Mathison. We like our strategic equity ownership with Toyota, and our recent sale of shares in Toyota and this distribution of shares was done in consultation together with TMC. So hopefully that addresses your question. We want to have a holding in TMC. We'd like moving that holding to the top of the holding company and having that of the Jardine Matheson directly related to the direct relationship with Toyota. In terms of your question around the I-Med CEO, it was not planned, but ultimately we made the decision to move the CEO on, given some actions and some things we found out. but ultimately we think we can find and identify a material upgrade in the CEO. Important for us is that this transaction is a partnership between Jardines, the management of IMED, and the medical community within IMED. And an important qualification we want in the CEO of this business is somebody

who can build confidence and long-term relationships with the medical practice and community of the IMED partnership. This needs to be harmonious, it needs to work, and we think a new CEO coming in will significantly upgrade the culture and the way we work with doctors. The next questions came from George Choi of Citi. First question is on Hong Kong land. Within your investment property portfolio in Chinese mainland is Westman Central the only untouchable? If any of the properties in China does not meet the return requirement that Hong Kong land is looking for, will they be disposed of? Second question on JCNC. Does the name change hint that more capital recycling will be done there? What do you see the role of JCNC evolving over the next five years within the group? Okay. First of all, I think in terms of questions on Hong Kong land and disposal strategies and property strategies, I think it's best to continue to have those conversations

principally with Mike Smith and Craig Beatty. That said, in terms of how you phrased your question, There's nothing in your question that I disagree with. That is exactly how we look at all properties. Westbun is still in development, and our equity ownership, what we do with it, it's too early to have any conversations around that, but it is a development we continue to put capital in and want to build. But ultimately, Hong Kong Land capital decisions, Mike and Craig are the right people to talk to. In terms of the name change of JCC, we want to reflect what this business is. is an intermediate holding company. Its principal purpose is to manage and cultivate our Astra and Vietnam key investment holdings there. It is going to be extremely unlikely that we will use JCNC to do new investments and new capital deployment. So in a sense, it is a holding vehicle. It is a vehicle which we plan to recycle more assets. There are non-core assets in that portfolio which we will look to divest.

And over time, we will look at different avenues to continue to simplify our holding in this part of our entire holding structure. But JCNC, Intermediate Holding Company, it will not have its own independent total shareholder return target. It's not going to be very unlikely. We do anything new within JCNC. The next questions came from Jeff Kang of CLSA. First question on impairment. Just to confirm, was there any impairment charge recognized at UT or Astra with respect to Matabe Goldmine. Second question on DIS, is there any implication on how JCNC or GM thinks about other listed equity investments going forward? Sure, there was no impairment on Matabe. Okay, the second question is, I think a distribution and share is a tool that we have available to us, and for the right assets, we will use distribution and shares. I think this is ultimately the first time we as a group have done this and we're trying

to do it in a fair way for all shareholders. But I think it's important for all shareholders to know that this is a tool available to us and for the right assets within our portfolio anywhere is something I will consider. The next questions came from Simon Jones of Goldman Sachs. Two questions. How do you feel about earnings outlook for Astra and growth driver going into second half of 2026? question, John Sheng produced in the first half of 26 should we be expecting further investment and if so the timeline? Sure, I mean I can have a go at both of them. I mean the earnings outlook for the second half at Astra, I'd probably refer you to Lincoln's answer to the question on Hong Kong land, obviously the right team to talk to directly about that is the Astra team, But we have reflected it in our own guidance. The uncertainty there is part of our prudent approach at this point in the year.

On Jungshung, look, it's a non-core holding for us. And so in line with our strategy to not focus on non-controlled positions for the long term then you should not expect us to be in there for the long term. Exactly the timing of when and how that will progress remains to be seen, but you should expect it to probably only move in one direction. The next questions came from Elizabeth Pang of DBS. She has three questions. First question on the name change. It was a bit surprising in terms of the announcement that came after the investor So why the timing? What has changed? Second question, Astra is set to have this October investor day. What can we expect and what would be the key items that JM team thinks is critical for Astra to execute on? Third question on integration of IMAT.

When do you expect earnings to start being accretive to JM? Okay. First off, on the JCNC name change, The reason again this is coming at this time is we do need to take this to a shareholder approval and it's all being done as part of the normal corporate governance cycle. The approval of the special dividend and approval of the name change were decided together in consultation with the board to bring to shareholders and the EGM at the same time. Again, this is just, again, it's been done in consultation with the board, and it was the appropriate time to do this together. In terms of the Astra Investor Day, my personal view is what do I want to see from the Astra Investor Day? I would like to see a clearer articulation of the strategy around the three core pillars of Astra. What are we going to do in auto? What is our growth in financing? What is our strategy around our United Tractors business?

needs to be the focus and the core of the investor day. I think often many questions Pac Rudy and Amy get about what they're gonna do in recycling, you know give us a long-term plan what are you gonna sell. As Graham often says it's a very awkward thing to talk about what children you don't like. I think what we should expect to see by the time the Astro Investor Day comes is actual recycling initiatives they have taken to simplify their portfolio as well. So I think they've come out and talked about their buyback program but they should continue to talk about operating strategies for their respective key verticals, where they have progressed in capital recycling, but also where they're advancing the team and culture and the deeper bench of management and talent within Astra. I think that should be the key areas that we would like to see come out of the investor day. In terms of IMED, I think we've been upfront in terms of when we announced the deal that we did not think it would be accretive to earnings until after 12 months. That continues to be where we see I-MED earnings to be.

And so, again, to be clear on that, I-MED, we think, itself will contribute to earnings next year. But net of the cost of financing the equity, we expect it to be neutral in the first 12 months. Two follow-on questions from John Lamb of UBS. The first one is on NAV. Looking into the next five years, John in Matheson's NAV composition is likely to shift more from unlisted NAV from listed to unlisted NAB, due to the path of building 200 million part time. So how do you think about that? Will that create complication in estimating your NAB? And thus perhaps do you want to have more regular disclosure on the unlisted business? Second question, will you consider listing Hong Kong line or DFI in Hong Kong? Wonderful. Sure, I'll take the first one. Look, I mean, we fortunately now have a thriving community of analysts who are well equipped and do publish NAVs on both the private and publicly listed

estimates and of course there's a range of approaches on those. Some take the market value for the listed entities, some take their own price estimates and we're grateful for that coverage but our business is we believe working with the portfolio companies to ensure that they operate well, managing capital effectively rather than putting out our views of what the valuation of the share should be. So we would encourage everybody to do that. We believe we've been a lot more transparent over the last four or five years in terms of the performance of the businesses and we will continue to be very open in dialogue with our coverage community and of course with our investors around the performance of private assets. There will be every bit as transparent in our results as of course the public companies are. But as to us publishing NAVs, I think that's unlikely in the near term.

In terms of your second question, I think it is clearly the case now that Hong Kong is the most attractive and most liquid exchange within Asia. That is a fact. The second thing we do believe, however, is relisting a business purely from the perception of potential arbitrage is a short-term value-creating exercise and not necessarily given to be a long-term value-creation exercise. So looking and exploring at putting any of our businesses on the Hong Kong exchange, there is nothing that prevents us from doing so. But as a long-term shareholder of the business, we are not in an exercise of redama styling just for our short-term pop or sugar hit on a stock. It needs to be the right stock exchange and the right stable exchange for our investors for the long term. But we are looking at all options around our businesses. There's no blocker for us to look at listing any business in the Hong Kong exchange.

Liquidity right now extremely attractive. The key for us needs to be the right decision for the long term. And of course, there are dual listing options as well. We are calling for any final questions that you may have. As a reminder, please scan the QR code if you would like to submit the questions. If not, we will close the Q&A session. Thank you very much for attending today's session and we look forward to seeing you in our next results presentation.